Clinton Email: We Must Destroy Syria For Israel

Hillary Clinton's work for Israel
Hillary Clinton's work for Israel

A leaked Hillary Clinton email confirms that the Obama administration, with Hillary at the helm, orchestrated a civil war in Syria to benefit Israel.

The new Wikileaks release shows the then Secretary of State ordering a war in Syria in order to overthrow the government and oust President Assad, claiming it was the “best way to help Israel”. reports:

The document was one of many unclassified by the US Department of State under case number F-2014-20439, Doc No. C05794498, following the uproar over Clinton’s private email server kept at her house while she served as Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013.

Although the Wikileaks transcript dates the email as December 31, 2000, this is an error on their part, as the contents of the email (in particular the reference to May 2012 talks between Iran and the west over its nuclear program in Istanbul) show that the email was in fact sent on December 31, 2012.

The email makes it clear that it has been US policy from the very beginning to violently overthrow the Syrian government—and specifically to do this because it is in Israel’s interests.

Clinton's email on Syria-Israel
Clinton's email on Syria-Israel

“The best way to help Israel deal with Iran’s growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad,” Clinton forthrightly starts off by saying.

Even though all US intelligence reports had long dismissed Iran’s “atom bomb” program as a hoax (a conclusion supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency), Clinton continues to use these lies to “justify” destroying Syria in the name of Israel.

She specifically links Iran’s mythical atom bomb program to Syria because, she says, Iran’s “atom bomb” program threatens Israel’s “monopoly” on nuclear weapons in the Middle East.

If Iran were to acquire a nuclear weapon, Clinton asserts, this would allow Syria (and other “adversaries of Israel” such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt) to “go nuclear as well,” all of which would threaten Israel’s interests.

Therefore, Clinton, says, Syria has to be destroyed.

Iran’s nuclear program and Syria’s civil war may seem unconnected, but they are. What Israeli military leaders really worry about — but cannot talk about — is losing their nuclear monopoly.

An Iranian nuclear weapons capability would not only end that nuclear monopoly but could also prompt other adversaries, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to go nuclear as well. The result would be a precarious nuclear balance in which Israel could not respond to provocations with conventional military strikes on Syria and Lebanon, as it can today.

If Iran were to reach the threshold of a nuclear weapons state, Tehran would find it much easier to call on its allies in Syria and Hezbollah to strike Israel, knowing that its nuclear weapons would serve as a deterrent to Israel responding against Iran itself.

It is, Clinton continues, the “strategic relationship between Iran and the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria” that makes it possible for Iran to undermine Israel’s security.

This would not come about through a “direct attack,” Clinton admits, because “in the thirty years of hostility between Iran and Israel” this has never occurred, but through its alleged “proxies.”

The end of the Assad regime would end this dangerous alliance. Israel’s leadership understands well why defeating Assad is now in its interests.

Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel’s security, it would also ease Israel’s understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly.

Then, Israel and the United States might be able to develop a common view of when the Iranian program is so dangerous that military action could be warranted.

Clinton goes on to asset that directly threatening Bashar Assad “and his family” with violence is the “right thing” to do:

In short, the White House can ease the tension that has developed with Israel over Iran by doing the right thing in Syria.

With his life and his family at risk, only the threat or use of force will change the Syrian dictator Bashar Assad’s mind.

The email proves—as if any more proof was needed—that the US government has been the main sponsor of the growth of terrorism in the Middle East, and all in order to “protect” Israel.

It is also a sobering thought to consider that the “refugee” crisis which currently threatens to destroy Europe, was directly sparked off by this US government action as well, insofar as there are any genuine refugees fleeing the civil war in Syria.

In addition, over 250,000 people have been killed in the Syrian conflict, which has spread to Iraq—all thanks to Clinton and the Obama administration backing the “rebels” and stoking the fires of war in Syria.

The real and disturbing possibility that a psychopath like Clinton—whose policy has inflicted death and misery upon millions of people—could become the next president of America is the most deeply shocking thought of all.

Clinton’s public assertion that, if elected president, she would “take the relationship with Israel to the next level,” would definitively mark her, and Israel, as the enemy of not just some Arab states in the Middle East, but of all peace-loving people on earth.

This was first published at Your News Wire.

47 thoughts on “Clinton Email: We Must Destroy Syria For Israel”

  1. What bullshit. It always bothers me with these posts that there is no Comment area under posts, you have to fanagle around to find a way to respond, which is Very Suspicious.
    Quit demonizing Clinton. The party of Trump is already doing that. Do you want Trump instead??! If so, you really have problems..!

    1. He is a pro-Iranian regime writer. Those ethnic Persians are reaping the benefits of being US citizens while maintaining loyalty to their grand wizard Khomeini. He is blatantly misleading the US public opinion by suggesting that the democratic administration had INITIATED the war in Syria, but if u look closely to the date of the wire, it is more than a year and half after the first demonstrations in Syria have taken place. I have noticed this frightening trend of ethnic Persians and Shiite Arab holders of US nationality intentionally lying to cover up the ethnic cleansing of hundreds of thousands of Syrians by the hands of Iran and its proxies, to make Iran and its proxies look good and at the same time to advocate the false claim that revolutions taking place in the Middle East were orchestrated by the democrats. The extent of iran’s infiltration of US media outlets and the size of its media lobbies

      1. It did start the war.

        Bilderberg meetings notes leaked many years ago stated that destabilising Syria through creating a rebellion, and if that failed, terrorism, was a strategic objective.

        They were also responsible for the chemical atack blamed on Assad’s forces, except independent journalists reported the truth – mishandling of the weapon supplied by the sauds during transit.

        There’s a world of fact out there, which you won’t find on TV or in the Zionist owned western media.


        1. As a Syrian I tell you this is NOT true. I was in Syria only months before demonstrations took place and I could tell that a rebellion is in the brewing. People were disillusioned, angry and hopeless of situation that was constantly taking a turn towards the worse. Assad’s regime was too arrogant even to sense that. Even worse, Assad was too arrogant even to sense that, sarcastically stating only a month and a half prior to demonstrations that the whole world can revolt against their regimes but Syrians couldn’t, a belittling comment that enfuriated people even further. The breaking point was the secret police arresting a bunch of twelve year old kids that painted anti Assad graffiti on their school’s wall. As their parents pleed that they were only kids and they should be released, the head of the secret police in Dara’a, also Bashar’s cousin, told them to forget about their kids and make new one, and that if they wouldn’t then the secret police would take their wives and make new kids out of them. There’s nothing more enfuriating to a tribal society like Daraa’s than threatening to rape their wives. Massive demonstrations broke out as most of the tribes in that area were related by blood and these were bound by a code of standing up for their kin in times of need. These demonstrations spread to other areas in Syria as people saw the brutal takedown of peaceful demonstrations that took place. Syria’s revolution is the voice of the poor and persecuted. For fifty years Syrians were persecuted and humiliated in every way possible by assad’s regime. I don’t need any televised or written media to know the truth as thousands of videos taken by phone are all over the Internet.

        2. And I can’t figure out whether ur statement about rebels staging the chemical attack is clueless or intentionally misleading! You CANNOT manufacture sarin gas except in large industrial facilities and it has to be stored under carefully regulated conditions since they have a low shelf life. For months prior to the massacre, assad’s regime was testing blank canisters emitting dense colored gas to examine whether or not the fumes would travel from the targeted area to Damascus. The attack itself involved twelve areas targeted simultaneously, the places where the chemical shells were fired from are well know and documented! Furthermore the head of Syrian army’s chemical warfare administration has defected following the attack and has testified in detail on the names of people involved. You ought to be careful what you claim because these attacks have claimed the lives of more than 1700 innocent civilians in their sleep and inflicted harm on many more; and diverting people’s attention onto the actual criminal that committed these crimes would not serve justice to those that died and is as hideous as committing the crime yourself

    2. Sorry but you’re misled.

      Try turning off tv, stop reading the papers, and pick up some history books from the library.

      Maybe then you’ll know enough to have context regarding Hillary and the crimes she is involved in, and the power elite she serves.

    3. You’re delusional at best.
      Trump is the only choice.
      #ButWaitThereIsMore. …..

  2. I think this sort of news is to create bad impression about Ms Clinton who is the next President of USA. I think she is far far better of Trump. Thanks

    1. Very true. To add to that, there’s another aspect of middle east related articles that promote the Iranian regime’s point of view in the region, it is the frightening fact that most of them are written by ethnic Persians loyal to the Iranian regime despite being US nationals. I have seen that too often for it to be a coincidence! These authors rely on the fact that the vast majority of Americans are uninformed about the situation in the Middle East and would rely on blatantly misleading claims to promote Irans views and interests in the region as well as to demonize democrats so as to undermine their bid in the upcoming elections. Taking this article as an example, the title suggests it was the US government that has INITIATED the popular revolution in Syria, labeling it the destruction of Syria, while looking closer at the date of the wire shows that it was written more than a year and a half after the onset of anti Assad demonstrations. Add to that their attempt to cover up the ethnic cleansing of hundreds of thousands of Syrians committed by Iran and its proxies and throw the blame over the democrats. It is really frightening the degree the Iranian regime has infiltrated US media outlets and the size its media lobbies have grown. The Iranian regime realizes that trump becoming president would be deleterious for the United States and therefore is pushing towards skewing the public opinions towards voting for him

      1. So you suggest people should buy the news aired on mainstream U.S media ?? You are doing a good job by playing a devils advocate..You may convince some of the Americans but can’t fool all of them. Donald trumps may be an idiot but he hasn’t got blood on his hands like rest of the democrats have. How come your honest mainstream media is silent on Slobodan Milosevic exoneration by ICTY….Where are the weapons of mass destruction which were repeatedly aired on your mainstream media…U.S military is playing havoc on this planet and your controlled mainstream media is silent. You are not in that moral position to even point fingers at iranians or someone else for that matter.

    2. We’ll please watch Global Research *Hillary Clinton a threat to all humanity .world war 3 on the table

  3. In no part of the email does it talk about “destroying Syria”.

    Only about “bringing down Assad” and to “overthrow” Assad’s regime.

    I don’t like Clinton. She IS a ‘hawk’. But why do you stoop to such infantile and misleading exaggerations?

    Why do you distort the words? It’s honesty and destroys your integrity. You are doing EXACTLY what the mainstream media does in manipulating a ‘story’ like this.

    Shame on you.

    1. He is just one of many ethnic Persians that promote the Iranian regime’s views by relying on blatantly misleading comments. I have been seeing this frightening trend for a while now! The title suggests that the US administration has INITIATED the war in Syria, calling it the destruction of Syria, while looking at the date of the wire shows that it has been written over a year and a half after the initiation of anti assad demonstrations. The fact is unprofessional propaganda tools like this author rely on the fact that the vast majority of Americans are uninformed about the situation in the Middle East and would post misleading claims to skew the US public opinion towards advocating Iran’s interests.

    2. And how do you bring down a regime like Assad’s..? You publicly shame it enough to make it go home!!! Or you insight hate ,anger and make wepons available for a rebellion??

  4. I understand that the people of United States are concerned about the presidential elections and I’m aware of the consequences of a republican president for the rest of the world. But still, I have to say that I’m impressed on how part of the people of US. just thinks about his on matters even when clearly the article address questions relate to international affairs.

  5. Media can do anything. At present most of media published false news. Anyway i like Hillary Clinton but this news really hurted me…… Most of political people are same and they don’t want to peace in the world such as USA

  6. nothing needs to be destroyed with HRC. shes already destroyed public trust by lying over and over through out the years on so many different issues. trump isnt any better but at least after 8 years of going no where with the dems..the reps will have a chance wether it be through trump or any other rep

  7. Nowhere did she say US must DESTROY Syria. Syrian insurgency was indigenous; the US and its Middle Eastern allies certainly took sides as it developed but that was justifiable- not only from the pov of strategic maneuverability but also a moral duty. Assas could not and should never be left alone to eat alive the rebel populations. These anti-imperialist groups would have loved to let Tehran and Russia be left alone with the brutal Syrian regime but sorry, that is not how it works.

  8. A very misleading (deliberately) article, even the title. Nowhere in the email does it say “Destroy Syria” as the title suggests and you repeat several times – it only talks about removing Assad, which was what most Western nations and many Middle Eastern countries wanted.
    You say that “directly threatening Bashar Assad ‘and his family’ with violence is the ‘right thing’ to do”. you put quote marks around parts of the sentence, implying you were quoting the email. You aren’t quoting! She says he and his family are “at risk” from the opposition (an indisputable fact) which will change his mind. At no point does she assert, as your highly misleading article suggests, that America should threaten his family or say it’s the right thing to do.
    This is shoddy journalism at its worst.

  9. Why would you need Hillary’s email to believe she played active role in sponsoring terrorism. America sponsored the war in the open without hiding anything. The financed known extremists they call moderate who caused the death of hundreds of thousands

    1. The email was dated in late 2012. I.e. A year and a half after the onset of demonstrations and assad’s brutal takedown. Even then US government was STILL debating whether or not to do the right thing and stand up for the weak and oppressed. Demonstrations that took place in Syria were spontaneous and all the babbling of America staging it is straight up shameless lying. That author is nothing but a hired pen that works for that scum khamenei’s regime. It aims to mislead american public opinion in favor of supporting Iran’s war crimes in Syria. Iranian’s realize that th detrimental effect someone like trump would have on America’s international influence would fall in favor of its expansionist role in the region. The true manufacturer of terrorism is that filthy ragged scum Khamenei along with hoard of primitive, self mutilating, backward thinking fanatics that operate on the premise of their apocalyptic prophecies stating that their crimes and destruction would bring about the revealing of their lost Mahdi. The crimes they have committed on the scale of a small country like Syria is worse than the nazis ever did to any country! There’s nothing more disturbing, cringing and contempt inspiring than the crimes Iran and its savage henchmen are committing in the name of Zeinab. And the claim that America has initiated unrest in Syria and that ISIS is the main issue in Syria aims to mislead adressing the root of the problem, that is Assad and the drug and weapons dealing pimp Khanenei

    2. You’re all arguing about a fantasy. This is not an email sent by Clinton, but to Clinton. The ‘to’ and ‘from’ parts are whited out anyway, thus the email looks like this:
      Date: 2000-12-31 22:00
      Subject: NEW IRAN AND SYRIA 2.DOC
      UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05794498 Date: 11/30/2015

      But how do we know it was to Clinton? Because James Rubin wrote the article for FP. Here it is:

  10. What an amazing report hillary is still unofficial woman to have access in these kinds of cases isnt she ?
    If she comes on power how does the next syria’s war term would be shaped
    I would like trump to get powrer he is honest to say truth or performing not like hillary to negotiate secretly

  11. I am from Vancouver,Canada and i wanted to say that the USA is a problem when it comes to supporting Israeli Apartheid and should be condemned.All people in the USA should demonstrate against the U.S. gov. support for Israeli Apartheid.Both Democrats and Republicans support Israeli Apartheid and should be condemned.There can be no peace with Israeli Apartheid.
    The majority of people in the world supports all Palestinian People in their fight against Israeli Apartheid.That support will continue.

  12. Everyone with more than one brain cell knows, USA has instigated war for their own and Israel’s advantage, in Syria, Ukraine, Iraq, Libya, what’s to argue about? They need taken to a Humanitarian court and tried for the havoc they have created and are still creating. Clinton is one of the most evil women on this planet and she will let hell loose.

    After this I don’t know how anyone can even think about voting for her?

Comments are closed.